Search
Patexia Interest Groups

IP Litigation > Nova Content

Written by: Adam Powell & Tiffany Young THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Before Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Peter v. Nantkwest, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-801 (Sup. Ct. Dec. 11, 2019) This week the Supreme Court answered a long-simmering question... Read More »
Johnstech International sued JF Microtechnology for infringing its patent related to semiconductor contactors for testing integrated circuits.  Both companies... Read More »
Western Plastics sued Dubose Strapping for infringing a patent covering a material for wrapping rolls of metal coil.  Both parties compete in the metal industry... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Appeal Nos. 2018-1363, et al. (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2019) In... Read More »
A few months ago, we wrote about the importance of the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Section 337 Investigation, and some of its advantages that can make... Read More »
Before Reyna, Hughes, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. TQ DELTA, LLC v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Summary: Findings of fact at the PTAB... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Wargaming Group Ltd. et al., Appeal No. 2019-1171 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2019) This week’s Case of the... Read More »
GAME AND TECH. CO., LTD. v. WARGAMING GROUP LTD. Before Dyk, Plager, and Stoll.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2018-1329, et al. (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2019) This... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. TCL Corporation, Appeal Nos. 2017-2381, -2385 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2019) In this week’s Case of the... Read More »
Reasonably Could Have Raised & Reasonably Diligent Prior to last year’s SAS decision, district courts split over whether non-petitioned grounds were... Read More »
AIRBUS S.A.S. v. FIREPASS CORPORATION Before Lourie, Moore, and Stoll.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Whether an asserted prior ... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-2140 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 31, 2019) In the most important case to affect America... Read More »
In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-2140 (Fed. Cir., Oct. 31, 2019), a three Judge Fed. Cir. panel of Moore, Reyna and Chen took a deep dive ... Read More »
Well, that Escalated Quickly… On the heels of the supplemental briefing discussed yesterday, the Federal Circuit has already issued its decision in ... Read More »
An Avalanche of FWD Do-Overs Imminent? Back in June I explained the latest constitutional challenge to AIA Trial Proceedings under the Appointments Clause of the... Read More »
Burden of Persuasion to Demonstrate Unpatentability on Petitioner The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Due to technical issues, this week’s report covers the past two weeks. HZNP Medicines LLC v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Appeal Nos. ... Read More »
Federal Gov’t & Federal Contractors in the Court of Federal Claims – A Legal Relationship? Federal government contractors are protected from... Read More »
Menu