Patexia Interest Groups

IP Litigation > Nova Content

Informative Decisions Address Design Choice Considerations Today, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) designated two ex parte appeal decision informative... Read More »
In OSI v. Apotex, Appeal no. 2018-1925 (Fed. Cir., October 4, 2019), the panel reversed the PTAB and found that the method of treatment claims in U.S. Pat. No... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, Appeal No. 2018-1763 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2019) In this week’s Case of... Read More »
Director Determinations Cannot be Made by an AIA Trial Panel Motion practice in AIA trial proceedings is typically limited to the handful of motions that may be... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK SIPCO, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co., Appeal No. 2018-1635 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2019) In this appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal... Read More »
A few weeks ago, we released our 3rd Annual IPR Intelligence Report. Several companies asked us to further explain how to use the Excel file came with the report for... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Inspired Development Grp, LLC v. Inspired Products Grp., LLC, Appeal No. 2018-1616 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2019) Our first patent case of the... Read More »
Unrebutted Secondary Indicia Considered in Assessing Becton-Dickinson Factors The submission of so-called “objective indicia of non-obviousness” at... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Curver Luxembourg, SARL v. Home Expressions Inc., Appeal No. 2018-2214 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2019) In a significant case in the field of... Read More »
Lack of Stakeholder Consensus on 101 Effort The sponsors of the promised bill to reform 35 U.S.C. § 101 are struggling to regain earlier momentum. It seems... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Board of Regents of the University of Texas Sys. v. Boston Scientific Corp., Appeal No. 2018-1700 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 5, 2019) This week’s ... Read More »
Exceptional Cases & The PTAB As discussed last month, as PTAB proceedings conclude at the Federal Circuit and return to the district courts, courts are... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK BioDelivery Sciences Int’l, Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2019-1643, -1644, -1645 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 29, 2019) Our... Read More »
Bayer sued Baxalta for infringing U.S. Patent No. 9,364,520.  This patent covers a protein necessary for blood clotting that is used in Baxalta’s... Read More »
Over the last few weeks, we have been covering some of the firms and law firms with the largest growth or decline in IPR activity over the last five years. We are... Read More »
GUANGDONG ALISON HI-TECH CO. V. ITC Before Wallach, Hughes, and Stoll.  Appeal from United States International Trade Commission. Summary: A term of... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1584 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2019) In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal... Read More »
In a case relating to systems to protect hair during bleaching treatments, Olaplex sued L’Oreal for patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and... Read More »
During the last couple of weeks, we have been covering law firms that had the largest decline (Patexia Insight 66) or growth (Patexia Insight 67) in their IPR... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK Nalpropion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories, FL, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1221 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2019) This week’s Case of... Read More »