Search
Patexia Community

Innovation, Technology, and IP News

Feed tagged as "ptab":
UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE v. CLEAR-VU LIGHTING LLC Before Reyna, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Federal... Read More »
On October 5, 2021, the U.S. Federal Circuit reversed a finding of invalidity by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for patent claims... Read More »
We have analyzed all the patent-related CAFC appeals, originating from the PTAB, ITC or district courts. The analysis covers a 5-year period, from January 1, 2016... Read More »
MOBILITY WORKX, LLC v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC Before Newman, Schall, and Dyk.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Fee-funded structure ... Read More »
Unpacking the Importance of the Claimed Invention from Other Commercial Components Objective indicia of non-obviousness, such as commercial success and industry... Read More »
Patent litigation remained strong in the second quarter of 2021. District court litigation, in particular, increased 11% in Q2 compared to Q1. Inter-Partes Review... Read More »
As we prepare to publish our first Federal Circuit IIntelligence Report, we plan to dive deep into the Federal Circuit patent cases, their origins, filing activity... Read More »
The first quarter of 2021 just ended but several recent trials in Waco, Texas including the famous VLSI Technology vs. Intel, which resulted in a $2.18B verdict... Read More »
In Re THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Before Prost, Lourie, and Reyna.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A claim directed to an innovative... Read More »
Inconsistency Across Related Cases is Precluded When challenging related patents at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), it is not uncommon to present... Read More »
Agency Left to Defend Unsettled Legacy Upon taking the reins at the USPTO, Director Iancu made clear that he believed the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB)... Read More »
SIPCO, LLC v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. Before O’Malley, Reyna, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board’s... Read More »
Joinder Estoppel Narrower Than Original Petition Estoppel Court’s have struggled with the meaning of the “reasonably could have raised” aspect... Read More »
PTAB Seeks Public Input Based on stakeholder feedback, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has added an online form (here) to the USPTO website that allows... Read More »
Transitional CBM Challenge Program Sunsets Today The America Invents Act (AIA) placed an expiration date on Covered Business Method (CBM) challenges.  That... Read More »
SECURITY PEOPLE, INC. v. IANCU Before Lourie, Wallach, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California... Read More »
The PTAB has been grappling with how to manage IPR petitions for patents that are also being challenged in federal district court, particularly when the district... Read More »
If the PTAB Fee Model is Biased, Patent Owners Have Much Bigger Problems Recently, a due process challenge has been raised to the PTAB fee model in New Vision... Read More »
CAFC Refuses Remand on 112 6th Deficiencies When challenging claims at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), Rule 42.104(b)(3) requires a Petitioner to... Read More »
FANDUEL, INC. v. INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC Before Dyk, Moore, and Hughes.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board does not violate ... Read More »
Show more Newsfeed posts
Menu