Patexia. Community

Innovation, Technology, and IP News

Data Breach: No Injury-in-Fact, Case Dismissed

It well known that there are, unfortunately, many data breaches that frequently put private citizens’ data privacy in jeopardy.  States have passed a variety of statutes...

To Limit or Not to Limit: What Is the Basis of Your Prior Art Distinction During Prosecution?

VECTURA LIMITED v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC Before Prost, Bryson, and Wallach.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware Summary: Distinguishing...

PTAB Adds Online Interface for POP Related Amicus Requests

Online Form Will Simplify Request Procedure To date, in order to submit an amicus brief in a PTAB case selected for Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) consideration, an interested party ...

Feed tagged as "anda":
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto.  Appeal from the District Court of New Jersey Summary: Venue ... Read More »
Update: Thanks to one of our readers who discovered an error in our ITC numbers for Q3. We have already updated the article with the correct data. The third... Read More »
This morning we released our first ANDA Litigation Intelligence Report. For the first time, we ranked all attorneys and law firms by their activity and performance... Read More »
IBSA INSTITUT BIOCHIMIQUE, S.A. V. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. Before Prost, Reyna, and Hughes.  Appeal from the District Court of Delaware Summary: A ... Read More »
The first half of 2020 is over and so far this year has been very challenging for all sectors of the economy. The legal sector has not been very different. Some law... Read More »
Running a profitable patent prosecution practice has become more challenging in recent years. The recession triggered by the current pandemic is going to make this... Read More »
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTL. v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. Before Lourie, Reyna, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary Before Lourie, Dyk, and Taranto. Appeal from the  District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary:  A passing reference ... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost, Lourie and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary:  When... Read More »
Written by Jane Xia and Jing Liu, Ph.D. MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. SANDOZ INC (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2017) (NEWMAN, Mayer, O’Malley) This case ... Read More »
Written by Peter Heuser, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt In Shire, the panel rejects defendant’s attempt to read “consisting of” as though... Read More »
In Intendis v Glenmark, the Federal Circuit affirmed a finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents based on statements made by Glenmark to the... Read More »
Comments
Curtis LeeSo in essence, the doctrine of estoppel is being applied to statements or positions taken outside the courtroom?
Oct 12, 2016
Jeff McIntyreNot necessarily estoppel. More like reliable evidence which can help prove the fact and which is difficult to rebut
Oct 12, 2016