Search
Patexia Community

Innovation, Technology, and IP News

Patent Experts Urge Kanter to Reject Calls to Scrap Avanci Business Review Letter

“The authors of the November 30 letter argue that the October 17 letter ‘perpetuates long-standing misunderstandings by some academics, policy activists, and companies, who ...

Patexia Insight 161: Top CAFC Law Firms of 2022

In late October, we released our second annual CAFC Intelligence Report. The report provided high-level statistics and insights and evaluated the stakeholders participating in the...

"They've Helped Themselves to My Artwork..." Banksy Accuses GUESS

  “Attention All Shoplifters…” Another guerrilla marketing strategy or unintentional (intentional) copyright infringement? This fall/winter 2022...

Get to Know This Year's Women Leaders in Tech Law

The Recorder honored the women lawyers handling game-changing, law-shaping, market moving work in and around the tech sector as part of the California Legal Awards on Nov. 3. Meet...

California Police Play Copyrighted Disney Tunes to Avoid YouTube Publishing

  Copyright intends to protect the rights of creators, but here is an interesting use that you probably haven't thought about. In recent years, the recording of police...

Feed tagged as "inter partes review":
In late October, we released our second annual CAFC Intelligence Report. The report provided high-level statistics and insights and evaluated the... Read More »
In early September, we published our IPR Intelligence Report, the sixth in an annual series covering the IPR proceedings landscape that took place... Read More »
Written by: Matthew Pham & Hans L. Mayer AMERICAN NATIONAL v. SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION [OPINION]- PRECEDENTIAL Before Stoll... Read More »
In early September we released our sixth annual IPR Intelligence Report 2022. The report reviewed IPR activity in the past five years and covered... Read More »
In early September, we published our sixth annual IPR Intelligence report. This popular report covers the IPR landscape by providing high-level... Read More »
Tomorrow we will release our 2022 CAFC Intelligence Report, where we have analyzed all the patent-related CAFC appeals from the USPTO, ITC, or... Read More »
  Just last week, a federal jury in Marshall, Texas, decided a patent infringement case between two of the three top... Read More »
When Apple and Qualcomm finally settled their dispute back in 2019, eyebrows were raised given that the licensing agreement had a six-year ... Read More »
This month we will publish our second annual CAFC Intelligence Report 2022, which covers the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). This... Read More »
It all goes back to 2019 when Philips accused Fitbit of infringement of four of its patents, 8,277,377, 6,013,007, 6,976,958, and... Read More »
Tomorrow we will be releasing our sixth annual IPR Intelligence report, where we covered the IPR filing activity from July 1, 2017, through June... Read More »
BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ELEKTA INC. Before Hughes, Linn, and Stoll.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. ... Read More »
California Institute of Technology v. Broadcom Inc. and Apple Inc. Before Lourie, Linn, and Dyk (concurring/dissenting).  Appeal from the District Court for... Read More »
MOBILITY WORKX, LLC v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC Before Newman, Schall, and Dyk.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Fee-funded structure ... Read More »
Last month we released our fifth annual IPR Intelligence Report. This popular IP report evaluates all stakeholders in Inter-Partes Review (IPR) proceedings each year. ... Read More »
U.S. v. Arthrex, Inc. Before the United States Supreme Court.  Majority opinion by Chief Justice Roberts.  On writ of certiorari to the United States... Read More »
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, LLC v. SNYDERS HEART VALVE LLC Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board... Read More »
CHRISTY, INC. v. UNITED STATES Before LOURIE, REYNA, and HUGHES.  Appeal from the Court of Federal Claims. Summary: The government’s refusal to... Read More »
SECURITY PEOPLE, INC. v. IANCU Before Lourie, Wallach, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California... Read More »
UNILOC 2017 LLC v. HULU, LLC Before O’Malley, Wallach, and Taranto.  O’Malley dissenting.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. ... Read More »
Show more Newsfeed posts
Menu