In a significant development in the legal industry, the long-established law firm, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, has decided to dissolve after 147 years of legal practice. This decision comes in the wake of a series of lawyer departures, which significantly impacted the firm's partnership, and unsuccessful merger attempts with larger firms. This article delves into the details of this decision and the factors that led to it.

Challenges Leading to Dissolution

Stroock, founded in 1876, has faced numerous challenges in recent years. While it was once recognized for its expertise in areas such as real estate and bankruptcy, it struggled to compete with larger, highly-profitable firms. Over the past year, the firm lost significant numbers of attorneys to rival law firms, further weakening its position in the legal market.

Notable Departures

Stroock's struggles began over a year ago when more than 40 bankruptcy lawyers left for rival Paul Hastings, significantly impacting the firm's other major practice area outside of real estate, which the firm struggled to recover. In one of the most significant departures, around 30 esteemed partners from Stroock's real estate practice are set to join Hogan Lovells. This substantial loss has effectively halved Stroock's remaining partnership ranks and is expected to significantly impact the firm's operations. The move to Hogan Lovells, including Jeffrey Keitelman and his real estate team, was a well-considered decision by Stroock's partnership, seen as offering the departing members the best opportunities and growth potential.

Failed Merger Attempts

To address these challenges, Stroock entered into discussions with several potential merger partners, including Steptoe & Johnson, McGuireWoods, and Squire Patton Boggs. However, these negotiations ultimately proved unsuccessful. The dissolution of Stroock was preceded by the termination of merger talks with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw & Pittman. Additionally, in July, Stroock and Nixon Peabody jointly announced the discontinuation of merger discussions. It's worth noting that the firm's pension obligations, which had reached an annual total of over $8 million, were identified as one of the stumbling blocks during the merger negotiations. These failed negotiations played a significant role in the firm's ultimate decision to dissolve.

Dissolution Process

Following a period of turmoil marked by a mass exodus of lawyers and failed merger negotiations, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan's partners have voted to dissolve the firm. Co-managing partners Jeff Keitelman and Alan Klinger conveyed this decision in an internal email. They indicated that the executive committee would soon take action based on the partners' authorization following an Oct. 24 vote. The dissolution process for Stroock will begin upon the closure of the transaction with Hogan Lovells, which is expected to occur in the next few weeks.

The closure of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan is a significant event in the legal world, marking the end of an era for the storied firm. It underscores the challenges faced by mid-sized law firms in the competitive legal landscape and highlights the importance of adapting to an ever-evolving industry. As the firm proceeds with the wind-down process, the legal community will reflect on its legacy while embracing the changes reshaping the legal profession.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Law Firm IP News and Updates